Azomonas agilis (Azotobacter agile) direkt kontakt dehidrogenáz aktivitás gátlási teszt talajra (angol nyelven)

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group

Organisation/Data provider's nameBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group
Name of contact
Dr. Molnár Mónika, Dr. Feigl Viktória
Telephone/fax
+36-1-4632347
Method Hungarian nameAzomonas agilis (Azotobacter agile) direkt kontakt dehidrogenáz aktivitás gátlási teszt talajra (angol nyelven)
Method name
Azomonas agilis (Azotobacter agile) dehydrogenase activity test for soil
Stage of development
developed, proven by demonstration
Name and number of the project
OM Biotechnologia 2000, BIO-000066/2000
Method type
laboratory test: acute toxicity test
Other type
interactive test in suspension
Toxicity tests
respiration: O2 consumption, CO2 production, enzime activity, ATP production
Endpoint of the test
EC20 / EC50 (Effective Concentration)
ED20 / ED50 (Effective Dose)
%
Number of used species
single species test
Test organisms
Bacterium
Exposition scenario
Characterisation of air
Duration of the test
short term = acute
Selectivity
non-selective
Contaminant group|Typical contaminant
  • Metals, semi-metals and their compounds
Selectivity
non-selective
Contaminant group|Typical contaminant
  • Petroleum derivatives (TPH)
Selectivity
non-selective
Contaminant group|Typical contaminant
  • Halogenated aliphatic organic compounds
Contaminant group|Typical contaminant
  • Other organic chemical substance
Instrument/equipment needed to perform the measurement
Microbiological tools and equipments
Standard materials for the test
Cu dilution series as reference
Reagents/materials for the test
TTC: triphenyl-tetrazoliumchloride
How many samples are needed
2 g soil or 5 ml liquid
How many tests can be performed simultaneously with one equipment
100
Data processing level
based on calibration curve with calculator
Necessary qualification
secondary education (chemical technician, chemical worker, laboratory assistant)
Type of laboratory for testing
microbiological laboratory
Purchase price of the equipment
below 40 Euro
Estimated equipment cost
below 40 Euro
Labour cost/measurement
2 - 4 Euro
Total cost/measurement
8 - 20 Euro
Brief concise description explaining the innovation

Whole soil instead of soil extract ensures direct contact with the test organism.Respiration inhibition due to toxic compounds is measured by dehydrogenase enzyme activity. The dehydrogenase activity is indicated by colour change. An alternative electron acceptor, TTC is added to the tested soil suspension. The colour change is due to the formation of formasane from TTC. The resulted red colour can be detected either visually in the soil suspension or measured by photometer after solvent extraction.

Typical (recommended) application of the method

In case of unknown contaminants and contaminant mixtures are in the soil. If the contaminant is not bioavailable and it is expected that the bioavailability changes in function of time and conditions. In case it is important that during the test the test microorganisms are in contact with the tested soil or it is important that any other decisive interactions take place.

Limits of the method

The presence of soil suspension may hinder the quality of visual evaluation.

Is there any Protocol
yes
Detailed Protocol

Azomonas agilis is kept on Fjodorov agar medium. After innoculation it is incubated at 28 ºC for 48 hours. The test requires that Azomonas agilis is innoculated into 30 ml sterile Fjodorov substrate. The innoculum is shaked for 72 hours at 28 ºC. 2-2 grams of the soil samples are sterilised in steam. A five series two-fold dilution series (0.5 g, 0.25 g, 0.125 g, 0.0625 g and 0.0312 g) is prepared in test tubes in sterile conditions. Other microorganisms may inhibit Azomonas agilis reproduction. 100 cm3 of sterile Fjodorov substrate and 1 cm3 of sterile TTC solution is added to 5 cm3 bacterium suspension shaken for 72 hours at 28 ºC. 2-2 cm3 of the prepared mixture is pipetted into the soil containing test tubes, then it is homogenised (by Vortex) and incubated for 72 hours at 28 ºC. As reference 400, 40, 4, 0.4 and 0.04 ppm Cu dilution series is used. Evaluation is done visually after 72 hours. Occurrence of red colour indicates microbial activity. In the presence of toxic metals dehydrogenase enzyme activity is inhibited or it is lower than the dehydrogenase activity of the uncontaminated control sample, therefore TTC is not reduced and consequently there is no red colour visible. When red colour is not detected the inhibition of the enzyme activity is 100%, when the red colour is only slightly visible the enzyme activity inhibition is 50%. The red colour indicates microbial activity and no inhibition. The inhibition values are plotted function of the soil dose. The soil dose relevant to 50% enzyme activity inhibition is read on the resulted dose-response curve showing the soil amount (in grams) that reduced the enzyme activity to the half.

Costs
4-low
Time requirement
4-low
Workload requirement
3-medium
Equipment, apparata requirement
5-very low
Qualified labour
4-low
Environmental risk and workplace risks
4-low
Environmental reality
4-good
Adequate accuracy
3-average
Reproducibility
3-average
Cost efficiency
4-good
Feasibility
4-good
Availability
2-weak
Well known
2-weak
Strengths

The used test organism and direct contact test are sensitive not only to the toxic metals but also to PAH and PCBs. Given that the test organism is a soil living organism one gets a realistic picture about the effect of contaminants on the soil ecosystem.

Weaknesses

The sensitivity of the test organism has to be controlled. The endpoint, the detected red colour may be subjective and difficult to evaluate in case of brown coloured soils that do not settle in water suspension.

Possibilities

The test results can be evaluated not only visually. The metabolism product resulting the red colour can be extracted by solvent and subjected to photometry. This way the results are more objective and quantitative.

Threats

The sample has to be sterilised. The soil sterilisation method has to be carefully selected taking into account the physical-chemical effects ( evaporation, decomposition, new toxic decomposition products) of the sterilisation method.

Important findings, points of interest, remarks

In case of high Kow contaminants and synergic effects the results of the tests on soil suspension show higher toxicity as compared to the water extracts of the same soil. For this reason this test is more conservative (within a realistic limit) than testing the water extract. Some contaminant-soil interactions may be so strong that due to the matrix effect of the soil the soil suspension test shows slighter effect than in case of water extract or leachate.

Publications

Gruiz, Horváth és Molnár (2001)Környezettoxikológia – Vegyi anyagok hatása az ökoszisztémára, Műegy.Kiadó, Bp.
Gruiz, K. (2005) Soil testing triad for contaminated soil – In: Soil Remediation No6. (Eds.Fava and Canepa) pp.45–70, INCA, It
Feigl, V., Atkári, Á., Anton, A., Gruiz, K. (2007) Chemical stabilisation combined with phytostabilisation, Adv. Mat. Res. 20–21, 315–318.
Feigl V., Atkári Á., Uzinger N., Gruiz K. (2006) Fémmel szennyezett területek integrált kémiai és fitostabilizációja, Orsz. Körny.véd. Konf. Kiadványa 99–108.

Location of the application, country
Hungary
Location of the application, town and/or region
Gyöngyösoroszi
Application area
Contaminant characterisationin in environmental element/phase/sample
General characterisation of surface water
Characterisation of the interaction between soil and pollutant
Characterisation of the effect of technological interventions
Environmental problem the method was applied to (old)
Polluted sites assessment: Screening
Polluted sites assessment: Detailed assessment method
Polluted sites assessment: Technology selection supporting method
Environmental monitoring: During technology operation: biomonitoring and integrated monitoring to follow the emissions
Environmental monitoring: After technology application (postmonitoring)
Direct, effect based decision systems
Measurement of the harmful effect:Toxicity, mutegenity and teratogenity testing of environmental samples
Measurement of the harmful effect: Toxicity, mutegenity and teratogenity testing of mixtures, wastes
Environmental element the method was applied to
Environmental monitoring
Environmental scenario the method was applied to
Water habitat: sediment exposed to threat by polluted surface water
Water habitat: water exposed to threat by polluted sediment
Water habitat: soil exposed to threat by polluted sediment (flood, erosion)
Terrestial habitat: polluted soil
Terrestial habitat: groundwater exposed to threat by polluted soil
Environmental element/phase the method was applied to
saturated soil (direct contact)
unsaturated soil (direct contact)
pore water
subsurface water
leachate
Lessons learned

The test may be used to monitor the phytoremediation technology, namely the toxic metal stabilisation effect of the applied additive.

Datasheet id (original)
692
Creator
Vaszita Emese
Status
Verified
Adatlap típusaBiological, ecotoxicological assessment and monitoring methods
Létrehozás
Módosítás