Skip to main content

Mutagenitási teszt (Ames-teszt) (angol nyelven)

Data provider

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group

Organisation/Data provider's nameBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group
Name of contact
Dr. Molnár Mónika, Dr. Feigl Viktória
Contact details
Telephone/fax
+36-1-4632347
Compulsory sheet
Method Hungarian nameMutagenitási teszt (Ames-teszt) (angol nyelven)
Method name
Mutagenicity test (Ames-test)
Stage of development
after application
Patent number
ISO 16240:2005
Information on the method
Method type
laboratory test: mutagenicity test
Measured endpoint
Mutagenicity tests
number of revertant
Carciogenity test
mutagenicity
Endpoint of the test
NOEC / NOEL No Observed Effects Concentration / Level
LOEC / LOEL: Lowest Observed Adverse Effects Concentration / Level
Number of mutants
Ration of mutants
Other endpoint
revertants concentration
Number of used species
single species test
Number of other species
various other species
Test organisms
Bacterium
Exposition scenario
Characterisation of air
Duration of the test
short term = acute
Description of the measurement technique
Reproducibility (%)
90.00
Deviation (%)
30.00
Selectivity
non-selective
Measuring range
Implementation conditions
Instrument/equipment needed to perform the measurement
General microbiological laboratory equipment
Other necessary equipment/tools
shaker, thermostate
Standard materials for the test
4-nitro-phenylenediamine, benza(a)pyrene or amino-fluorene solutions
Reagents/materials for the test
nutrient solutions, substrates, S9-mix (rat liver extract, NADP, glü-6P)
How many samples are needed
1-2 gram or ml
How many tests can be performed simultaneously with one equipment
20
Data processing level
data input in PC, data evaluation by excel or other software
Necessary qualification
higher education (chemist, chemical eng., biologist, bioeng, environmental eng, microbiologist, agroeng)
Type of laboratory for testing
microbiological laboratory
Implementation costs
Purchase price of the equipment
below 40 Euro
Estimated equipment cost
below 40 Euro
Labour cost/measurement
2 - 4 Euro
Total cost/measurement
20 - 40 Euro
Innovation, main features
Brief concise description explaining the innovation

The histidine operon of the Salmonella bacterial test strain used in this test has various mutations, for which reason these strains cannot syntetise hystidine, therefore their growth is inhibited unless the damaged gene sequence of the test organism is restored by a new mutation or reverse mutation.

Typical (recommended) application of the method

The Ames test is a quick, reverse-mutation test able to screen the mutagenic effects of chemicals. It is used to replace or precede animal tests. If the Ames test is positive than the chemical is mutagenic. If the Ames test is negative the chemical may be mutagenic or carcingenic to humans and animals.

Limits of the method

Interpretation of the results is difficult without having the possibility to compare them with animal tests. Nowdays there are many results available so that the Salmonella can be used as a model system. Even this way one is faced with contradictions ex. Pentachlorphenol proved to be mutagenic and carcinogenic in case of animal tests and negative in Ames test.

Is there any Protocol
yes
Detailed Protocol

ISO 16240:2005

SWOT (evalaution based on scores)
Costs
3-medium
Time requirement
4-low
Workload requirement
2-high
Equipment, apparata requirement
4-low
Qualified labour
3-medium
Environmental risk and workplace risks
3-medium
Environmental reality
4-good
Adequate accuracy
3-average
Reproducibility
3-average
Cost efficiency
4-good
Feasibility
4-good
Availability
3-average
Well known
3-average
SWOT (evaluation in words)
Strengths

It does not need special equipment. It can replace expensive, laborious and ethically questionable animal tests. The statistics of the measurement can be improved because it allows many repetitions.

Weaknesses

The mutation is a statistical phenomenon, it is difficult to be reproduced accurately and it needs more parallel measurements. However, based on the concentration dependance of the mutations the positive effect is obvious allowing also statistical evaluation.

Possibilities

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity can be assessed also based on the Ames test results without animal test. Activation of certain chemicals during human digestion can be modelled by in vitro pre-treatment. The mixture of test-organisms containing various mutations is able to detect the effect of mutagenic chemicals of various mechanism.

Threats

The conformity of mammal and Ames test results is approximately 80% meaning that in some cases mutagenicity is underestimated while in other cases overestimated.

Other information, references
Important findings, points of interest, remarks

Some chemicals do not appear to be mutagenic although the animal tests proved to be mutagenic and carcinogenic. In case the contaminant and its mutation effect mechanisms are unknown, the other Salmonella mixture is to be used in order to avoid the false negative result.

Publications

Maron, D. M.; Ames, B. N.: Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test Mutation Research, 113, pp. 173-215, 1983

OECD 471 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/31/1948418.pdf

Completed applications
Location of the application, country
Hungary
Location of the application, town and/or region
Budapest
Application area
Measurement of the effect/physical-chemical properties of the chemical substance
Environmental problem the method was applied to (old)
Direct, effect based decision systems
Derivation of effect based environmental quality criteria
Measurement of the harmful effect: Toxicity, mutegenity and teratogenity testing of chemical substances
Other environmental problem
General risk of chemicals
Environmental element/phase the method was applied to
saturated soil extract
unsaturated soil extract
pore water
subsurface water
surface water
leachate
Lessons learned

The water solution of pentachlorphenol (PCP) did not indicate mutagenicity.
The pretreatment modelling digestion did not result mutagenicity in case of PCP.
The test results of the cyclodextrine-PCP complex were positive. See also datasheet No. 314 on the use of cyclodextrine for soil mutagenicity test.

Pictures
Properties of the datasheet
Datasheet id (original)
693
Creator
Vaszita Emese
Status
Verified
Adatlap típusaBiological, ecotoxicological assessment and monitoring methods
Létrehozás
Módosítás