Skip to main content

Gyors bioakkumulációs teszt Sinapis albával (angol nyelven)

Data provider

Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group

Organisation/Data provider's nameBudapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology Group
Name of contact
Dr. Molnár Mónika, Dr. Feigl Viktória
Contact details
Telephone/fax
+36-1-4632347
Compulsory sheet
Method Hungarian nameGyors bioakkumulációs teszt Sinapis albával (angol nyelven)
Method name
Rapid plant bioaccumulation test with Sinapis alba
Stage of development
after application
Name and number of the project
Development of risk assessment supporting methods
Information on the method
Method type
laboratory test: bioaccumulation test
Measured endpoint
Bioaccumulation tests
chemical analysis of the accumulated chemical substance
Endpoint of the test
Other
Other endpoint
BCF (Bioconcentration factorr)
Number of used species
single species test
Test organisms
Plant
Exposition scenario
Characterisation of air
Duration of the test
short term = acute
Description of the measurement technique
Reproducibility (%)
30.00
Deviation (%)
20.00
Selectivity
non-selective
Measuring range
Contaminant group|Typical contaminant
  • Metals, semi-metals and their compounds
Implementation conditions
Instrument/equipment needed to perform the measurement
20 °C thermostate, autoclave or dessicator, laminary box
Other necessary equipment/tools
Petri dish, pipette, balance
Standard materials for the test
standard soil, standard dilution series
Reagents/materials for the test
Sterile tap water
How many samples are needed
5 grams
How many tests can be performed simultaneously with one equipment
32
Data processing level
data input in PC, data evaluation by excel or other software
Necessary qualification
secondary education (chemical technician, chemical worker, laboratory assistant)
Type of laboratory for testing
microbiological laboratory
Implementation costs
Purchase price of the equipment
below 40 Euro
Labour cost/measurement
4 - 8 Euro
Total cost/measurement
8 - 20 Euro
Innovation, main features
Brief concise description explaining the innovation

The advantage of the plant test with Sinapis alba is that it provides results on the bioavailable metal content of the soil in only one week instead of several weeks. The test allows also the study of organic metal uptake by plants. On the other hand the test is easy to be performed, does not need special qualifications, the sample amount and the lab equipment requirement is low, therefore the costs are low.

Typical (recommended) application of the method

It is primarily used to measure the metal uptake of plants from the soil.

Limits of the method

In case the soil is susceptible to mould forming the plants start to get rotten in the Petri dish after the third day. Plant growth is inhibited in case of very toxic soils. This can be avoided by running more parallel tests. The soil grains stuck on the plant roots are not easy to be washed. For this reason the test is mainly recommended for measurement of metal uptake by shoots. The soil can be removed from the roots by washing shortly with diluted hydrogen sulphate.

Is there any Protocol
yes
Detailed Protocol

5-5 grams of soil from the air dried, chrushed and sieved (1-2 mm mesh), autoclave or dessicator sterilised soil samples are put and uniformly distributed in a 10 cm diameter Petri dish. It is uniformly wetted with 2.5-3.5 ml tap water and sterilised for half an hour in UV light. 40 white mustard (Sinapis alba) seeds are placed on the surface of the soil at equal distance from each other. The samples are kept in dark for 5 days in thermostate at 20°C. After the 3rd day they are additionally wetted with 0.25 ml of tapwater. After 5 days the shoots and roots of the grown plants are cut and separated by a non metallic piece such as plastic knife, are washed with tap water and are air dried at room temperature. Then the samples are sent to chemical analysis. Usually two parallel tests are run from one soil sample.
The plants are digested in the mixture of hydrogen peroxide and hydrogen nitrate and the extract is subjected to ICP-AES analysis.

SWOT (evalaution based on scores)
Costs
4-low
Time requirement
4-low
Workload requirement
4-low
Equipment, apparata requirement
4-low
Qualified labour
4-low
Environmental risk and workplace risks
5-very low
Environmental reality
5-excellent
Adequate accuracy
5-excellent
Reproducibility
4-good
Cost efficiency
4-good
Feasibility
4-good
Availability
5-excellent
Well known
2-weak
SWOT (evaluation in words)
Strengths

The advantage of the method is that as opposed to the general bioaccumulation tests running for several weeks, this method gives the results in one week on the available metal content in the soil for plant uptake. The test is easy to be performed, does not need special qualifications, the sample amount and the lab equipment requirement is low, therefore the costs of the biological part are low.

Weaknesses

In case the soil is capable of quick and intensive mould forming the plants start to get rotten in the Petri dish after the third day.
Plant growth is inhibited in case of very toxic soils thus there will be not enough biomass produced for accurate analysis. This can be avoided by running more parallel tests.
The soil grains stuck on the plant roots are not easy to be washed away so that the remaining grains may falsify the measurements. For this reason the test is mainly recommended for measurement of metal uptake by shoots. The soil grains can be removed from the roots by washing shortly with diluted hydrogen sulphate.
The chemical analysis of the plants metal content varies according to the analysed metal and applied analytical method. This cost component should be taken into account separately.

Possibilities

The test can be further developed to measure the likely to be accumulated organic substance uptake.
The test can be combined with biomass measurement, shoot and root elongation measurement ecotoxicological test.This way a single test provides information also on soil toxicity. This test can be used also in case of sediment or water.

Threats

No special hazards exhibited by this method.

Other information, references
Important findings, points of interest, remarks

There is no rapid bioaccumulation test described in the literature. This test is a combination of biotest and chemical analysis.

Webpage references and DEMO reports

www.ecorisk.hu
Feigl Viktória: Rapid ioaccumulation test with Sinapis alba, Study, LOKKOCK projec, in Hungarian

Publications

Feigl, V.; Atkári, Á.; Uzinger, N, és Gruiz, K.: Fémmel szennyezett területek integrált kémiai és fitoremediácója – Siófoki Országos Környezetvédelmi Konferencia és Szakkiállítás kiadványa, 2006. szeptember 19–21, pp. 99–107
Feigl, V., Atkári, Á., Anton, A. and Gruiz, K.: Chemical stabilisation combined with phytostabilisation applied to mine waste contaminated soil in Hungary – Advanced Materials Research Vols. 20–21 (2007), pp. 315–318, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland

Completed applications
Location of the application, country
Hungary
Location of the application, town and/or region
Budapest
Year of application
2004
Application area
Characterisation of the effect of technological interventions
Environmental problem the method was applied to (old)
Bioaccumulation tests
Other
Other environmental problem
food chain risk, toxicity of food plants
Environmental scenario the method was applied to
Terrestial habitat: polluted soil
Human usage: soil - agricultural
Human usage: soil - residental
Other
Other scenario
plants grown on soil
Environmental element/phase the method was applied to
other
Properties of the datasheet
Datasheet id (original)
695
Creator
Vaszita Emese
Status
Verified
Adatlap típusaBiological, ecotoxicological assessment and monitoring methods
Létrehozás
Módosítás